Show simple item record

contributor authorPazan, Stephen E.
contributor authorNiiler, Peter P.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:22:44Z
date available2017-06-09T14:22:44Z
date copyright2001/03/01
date issued2001
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-1826.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154245
description abstractThe authors have quality controlled six global datasets of drifting buoy data, made comparisons of 15-m drogued and undrogued buoy observations, and developed a 2D linear regression model of the difference between drogued and undrogued drifter velocity as a function of wind. The data were acquired from 2334 Surface Velocity Program (SVP) drifters, including 1845 SVP drifters after they lost their drogues; 704 AN/WSQ-6 Navy drifter buoys; and 503 First Global GARP Experiment (FGGE) drifter buoys. Meridional and zonal surface wind velocity components from the global synoptic FNMOC model, the global synoptic ECMWF model, and the global synoptic NCEP model were interpolated to naval AN/WSQ-6, WOCE?TOGA buoy, or FGGE buoy positions and date/times in the datasets. Two-day mean buoy drift velocities and positions were computed: 122?101 SVP drifter mean velocities before they lost their drogues and 58?201 SVP drifter mean velocities after they lost their drogues, 21?799 Navy drifter mean velocities, and 42?338 FGGE drifter mean velocities. A regression analysis was made on selected data in selected 2° lat ? 8° long bins: Uundrogued = Aundrogued + BundroguedWundrogued, Udrogued = Adrogued + BdroguedWdrogued, where Uundrogued, Udrogued was ensemble mean buoy velocity and W was wind velocity, and the real and imaginary parts of these quantities were the zonal and meridional components, respectively. The difference in these complex valued regression coefficients, Bdifference = Bundrogued ? Bdrogued measured the linear response to the wind. Navy and SVPL buoy response to the wind was identical and FGGE buoy response was generally the same; the global weighted mean value of |Bdifference| was 0.0088 ± 0.002. The difference in the complex valued y intercept, Adifference = Aundrogued ? Adrogued, was nearly always zero within error. The buoy response to wind was also estimated by b = (Uundrogued ? Udrogued)/Wundrogued, where the velocity difference Uundrogued ? Udrogued was calculated from ensemble mean buoy velocities and W was ensemble mean wind velocity. The global-weighted mean value of |b| was 0.0097 ± 0.005. The analysis also found that the phase angle of either Bdifference or b, which measures the velocity difference with respect to the wind, was zero within error and not a function of the surface wind or the Coriolis parameter.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleRecovery of Near-Surface Velocity from Undrogued Drifters
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0476:RONSVF>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage476
journal lastpage489
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record