Show simple item record

contributor authorCoakley, James A.
contributor authorWielicki, Bruce A.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:21:01Z
date available2017-06-09T14:21:01Z
date copyright1979/11/01
date issued1979
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-17782.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4153714
description abstractAdopting procedures often applied to model the earth's climate, we use zonal fields from the control run of a general circulation climate model (GCM) (Wetherald and Manabe, 1975) to construct parameterizations of the energy budget components for use in. a simple Budyko-Sellers energy balance climate model (EBM) (North, 1975). Comparing the results of the GCM and the EBM for changes in solar constant, we find that with these parameterizations changes in the surface temperature calculated with the EBM are substantially larger than those calculated with the GCM. Furthermore, when the meridional energy transport in the EBM is held constant so that it simulates the transport in the GCM, the results of the two models diverge hopelessly. On the other hand, with the parameterizations of the EBM modified to simulate the behavior of the GCM fields, the results of the two models agree fairly well. This exercise illustrates the weakness of current methods used to extract parameterizations for EBMs from observations of the present climate.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleTesting Energy Balance Climate Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume36
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<2031:TEBCM>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage2031
journal lastpage2039
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1979:;Volume( 036 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record