Show simple item record

contributor authorMiyakoda, K.
contributor authorStrickler, R. F.
contributor authorNappo, C. J.
contributor authorBaker, P. L.
contributor authorHembree, G. D.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:15:49Z
date available2017-06-09T14:15:49Z
date copyright1971/05/01
date issued1971
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-15955.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4151684
description abstractTruncation error of the numerical solution in a circulation model is still one of the most serious sources of error for the extended-period prediction. Different grid intervals are taken and the behavior of the solution is studied empirically. The meshes for the hemispheric domain are N=20, 40 and 80, where N is the number of grid points between the pole and the equator on the stereographic projection map. Analysis revealed that finer meshes provide clearly better solutions even for the planetary-scale mode, and the N=80 solution is definitely different from the N=40 beyond about 6 days. Further comparisons were made to see if the N=80 solution is actually closer to observation. The results were encouraging. Promise is seen for improvement in the forecast to about 10 days. The inclusion of subgrid-scale eddy viscosity, which seems to be necessary when applying a grid to the flow field, is also examined.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Effect of Horizontal Grid Resolution in an Atmospheric Circulation Model
typeJournal Paper
journal volume28
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0481:TEOHGR>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage481
journal lastpage499
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1971:;Volume( 028 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record