Show simple item record

contributor authorSmith, Paul L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:08:50Z
date available2017-06-09T14:08:50Z
date copyright2003/07/01
date issued2003
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-13265.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148696
description abstractGamma functions are widely used in an effort to represent characteristics of observed raindrop size distributions, especially at the small-particle end. However, available instruments do not agree about the character of the small-drop region, and for many purposes that part of the spectrum is unimportant. At the large-drop end, sampling limitations impede reliable measurements. Thus, when moment methods are used to determine parameters for the fitted functions, the experimental uncertainties tend to be greater than the differences in important bulk quantities, such as rainfall rate or radar reflectivity factor, between the resulting gamma distributions and corresponding, simpler exponential distribution functions. It consequently makes little practical difference whether exponential or gamma functions are employed, and the exponential model is appropriate for many purposes.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleRaindrop Size Distributions: Exponential or Gamma—Does the Difference Matter?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume42
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1031:RSDEOG>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1031
journal lastpage1034
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2003:;volume( 042 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record