Show simple item record

contributor authorWarner, Thomas T.
contributor authorSheu, Rong-Shyang
contributor authorBowers, James F.
contributor authorIan Sykes, R.
contributor authorDodd, Gregory C.
contributor authorHenn, Douglas S.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:08:23Z
date available2017-06-09T14:08:23Z
date copyright2002/05/01
date issued2002
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-13143.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148561
description abstractEnsemble simulations made using a coupled atmospheric dynamic model and a probabilistic Lagrangian puff dispersion model were employed in a forensic analysis of the transport and dispersion of a toxic gas that may have been released near Al Muthanna, Iraq, during the Gulf War. The ensemble study had two objectives, the first of which was to determine the sensitivity of the calculated dosage fields to the choices that must be made about the configuration of the atmospheric dynamic model. In this test, various choices were used for model physics representations and for the large-scale analyses that were used to construct the model initial and boundary conditions. The second study objective was to examine the dispersion model's ability to use ensemble inputs to predict dosage probability distributions. Here, the dispersion model was used with the ensemble mean fields from the individual atmospheric dynamic model runs, including the variability in the individual wind fields, to generate dosage probabilities. These are compared with the explicit dosage probabilities derived from the individual runs of the coupled modeling system. The results demonstrate that the specific choices made about the dynamic-model configuration and the large-scale analyses can have a large impact on the simulated dosages. For example, the area near the source that is exposed to a selected dosage threshold varies by up to a factor of 4 among members of the ensemble. The agreement between the explicit and ensemble dosage probabilities is relatively good for both low and high dosage levels. Although only one ensemble was considered in this study, the encouraging results suggest that a probabilistic dispersion model may be of value in quantifying the effects of uncertainties in a dynamic-model ensemble on dispersion model predictions of atmospheric transport and dispersion.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEnsemble Simulations with Coupled Atmospheric Dynamic and Dispersion Models: Illustrating Uncertainties in Dosage Simulations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume41
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0488:ESWCAD>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage488
journal lastpage504
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2002:;volume( 041 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record