Show simple item record

contributor authorFerretti, Rossella
contributor authorPaolucci, Tiziana
contributor authorZheng, W.
contributor authorVisconti, Guido
contributor authorBonelli, P.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:07:18Z
date available2017-06-09T14:07:18Z
date copyright2000/02/01
date issued2000
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-12810.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148191
description abstractThe analysis of several precipitation events occurring during June 1990 in the Alpine region is performed using the Pennsylvania State University?National Center for Atmospheric Research Fifth-Generation Mesoscale Model, version 1. A high-resolution dataset provided by Monitoring Precipitation Activity in the Padana Region observational campaign (June 1990) is used to verify the model forecast. Comparisons between model simulations, using different cumulus convective schemes associated with either an explicit computation of cloud water and rain (EXP) or a nonconvective scheme (NEXP), have been performed. The comparisons of EXP versus NEXP give indications of the ability of a cumulus scheme to handle nonconvective precipitation. On the other hand, comparing the schemes allows for evaluation of the ability to reproduce total and convective precipitation. The results show that the amount and the areal extent of the total precipitation are well reproduced if a cumulus scheme is associated with EXP; the differences between the simulations performed using EXP and NEXP are reduced if the precipitation is driven by a strong large-scale forcing such as a front. The comparison of the cumulus convection parameterizations highlights the different responses of the schemes to the meteorological situation. When the explicit computation of cloud water and rain is used, a good localization of the rain cells and a fair estimation of the amount of precipitation are obtained using either the Kain?Fritsch or the Grell cumulus convection parameterizations. On the other hand, the Anthes?Kuo scheme produces a strong overestimation of the precipitation regardless of the meteorological forcing and with both EXP and NEXP. The bias and the threat score for the cases analyzed confirm this finding. Sensitivities to different initial conditions for the same case show that the precipitation forecast depends on the strength of the signal contained in the initial conditions.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleAnalyses of the Precipitation Pattern on the Alpine Region Using Different Cumulus Convection Parameterizations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume39
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0182:AOTPPO>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage182
journal lastpage200
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2000:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record