Show simple item record

contributor authorCrosson, William L.
contributor authorDuchon, Claude E.
contributor authorRaghavan, Ravikumar
contributor authorGoodman, Steven J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:05:52Z
date available2017-06-09T14:05:52Z
date copyright1996/08/01
date issued1996
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-12351.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147681
description abstractPrecipitation estimates from radar systems are a crucial component of many hydrometeorological applications, from dash flood forecasting to regional water budget studies. For analyses on large spatial scales and long timescales, it is frequently necessary to use composite reflectivities from a network of radar systems. Such composite products are useful for regional or national studies, but introduce a set of difficulties not encountered when using single radars. For instance, each contributing radar has its own calibration and scanning characteristics, but radar identification may not be retained in the compositing procedure. As a result, range effects on signal return cannot be taken into account. This paper assesses the accuracy with which composite radar imagery can be used to estimate precipitation in the convective environment of Florida during the summer of 1991. Results using Z = 300 R1.4. (WSR-88D default Z-R relationship) are compared with those obtained using the probability matching method (PMM). Rainfall derived from the power law Z-R was found to be highly biased (+90%?110%) compared to rain gauge measurements for various temporal and spatial integrations. Application of a 36.5-dBZ reflectivity threshold (determined via the PMM) was found to improve the performance of the power law Z-R, reducing the biases substantially to 20%?33%. Correlations between precipitation estimates obtained with either Z-R relationship and mean gauge values are much higher for areal averages than for point locations. Precipitation estimates from the PMM are an improvement over those obtained using the power law in that biases and root-mean-square errors are much lower. The minimum timescale for application of the PMM with the composite radar dataset was found to be several days for area-average precipitation. The minimum spatial scale is harder to quantify, although it is concluded that it is less than 350 km2. Implications relevant to the WSR-88D system are discussed.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleAssessment of Rainfall Estimates Using a Standard Z-R Relationship and the Probability Matching Method Applied to Composite Radar Data in Central Florida
typeJournal Paper
journal volume35
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<1203:AOREUA>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1203
journal lastpage1219
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1996:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record