Show simple item record

contributor authorVogel, Christoph A.
contributor authorBaldocchi, Dennis D.
contributor authorLuhar, Ashok K.
contributor authorRao, K. Shankar
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:05:22Z
date available2017-06-09T14:05:22Z
date copyright1995/10/01
date issued1995
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-12207.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147521
description abstractSeveral methods for estimating surface energy balance components over a vegetated surface are compared. These include Penman-Monteith, Deardorff, and multilayer canopy (CANWHT) models for evaporation. Measurements taken during the 1991 DOE-sponsored Boardman Area Regional Flux Experiment over a Well-irrigated, closed wheat canopy are used in the comparison. The relative performance of each model is then evaluated. It is found that the Penman-Monteith approach using a simple parameterization for stomatal conductance performs best for evaporation flux. The Deardorff model is found to have the best relative performance for sensible heat, while the CANWHT model gives the best results for net radiation and soil heat flux. The Priestley-Taylor model for evaporation and a resistance-analog equation for sensible heat flux are also tested.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Comparison of a Hierarchy of Models for Determining Energy Balance Components over Vegetation Canopies
typeJournal Paper
journal volume34
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2182:ACOAHO>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage2182
journal lastpage2196
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1995:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record