Show simple item record

contributor authorRangno, A. L.
contributor authorHobbs, P. V.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:04:41Z
date available2017-06-09T14:04:41Z
date copyright1993/12/01
date issued1993
identifier issn0894-8763
identifier otherams-11988.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147276
description abstractA further examination of the Climax I and II randomized cloud-seeding experiments has revealed the following. 1) Cloud seeding had no effect on precipitation in Climax I after the control stations had been chosen halfway through the experiment. 2) Faulty execution of the randomization scheme resulted in a misleading precipitation climatology and a misleading relationship between cloud-top and 500-mb temperatures for the control days. 3) The method of assigning upper-level winds and temperatures to experimental days emphasized widespread, synoptic-scale weather systems with cloud tops far above 500 mb rather than the orographic ?blanket? clouds that were sought. 4) Particle trajectory calculations show that it is unlikely that the silver iodide released from the ground could have affected precipitation at Climax in southwest flow, the category for which the greatest seeding effect was reported.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleFurther Analyses of the Climax Cloud-Seeding Experiments
typeJournal Paper
journal volume32
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<1837:FAOTCC>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1837
journal lastpage1847
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1993:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record