Show simple item record

contributor authorBrian E. Reed
contributor authorJames N. Jensen
contributor authorMark R. Matsumoto
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:10:12Z
date available2017-05-08T21:10:12Z
date copyrightMay 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%281993%29119%3A3%28585%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/41299
description abstractAdsorption of heavy metals onto activated carbon has been described using the surface‐complex‐formation (SCF) model, a chemical equilibrium model. The SCF model requires a knowledge of the amphoteric nature of activated carbon prior to metal adsorption modeling. In the past, a single‐diprotic‐acid‐site model had been employed to describe the amphoteric nature of activated‐carbon surfaces. During this study, the amphoteric nature of two powdered activated carbons were investigated, and a three‐monoprotic site surface model was found to be a plausible alternative. The single‐diprotic‐acid‐site and two‐monoprotic‐site models did not describe the acid‐base behavior of the two carbons studied adequately. The two‐diprotic site was acceptable for only one of the study carbons. The acid‐base behavior of activated carbon surfaces seem to be best modeled as a series of weak monoprotic acids.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAcid‐Base Characteristics of Powdered‐Activated‐Carbon Surfaces
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1993)119:3(585)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record