Show simple item record

contributor authorD. E. Reeve
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:10:07Z
date available2017-05-08T21:10:07Z
date copyrightSeptember 1998
date issued1998
identifier other%28asce%290733-950x%281998%29124%3A5%28219%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/41255
description abstractIn many parts of the world, design standards now require the assessment of risks. Measures of risk are often qualitative, with descriptors such as “high,”“low,”“intolerable,” or “negligible.” The practitioner is thus left with the task of reconciling the qualitative assessment of risks with the quantitative demands of design. Probabilistic techniques are being used increasingly for the design and assessment of sea defenses. In this paper the use of probabilistic techniques in risk assessment for sea defenses is considered. The respective advantages and disadvantages of different techniques are discussed. Some new approximate methods are described and compared with existing approaches. Example calculations based on 21 years of synthesized wave and water level data are presented for the case of wave overtopping. The different methods are employed to calculate the probabilities of exceeding the overtopping threshold for two structures. The results are used to discuss what might be considered practical and realistic in terms of risk assessment for sea defenses, and to identify areas where further research could be beneficial.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCoastal Flood Risk Assessment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1998)124:5(219)
treeJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 124 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record