Show simple item record

contributor authorTingju Zhu
contributor authorJay R. Lund
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:08:25Z
date available2017-05-08T21:08:25Z
date copyrightMarch 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282009%29135%3A2%2890%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40208
description abstractLevee setback (location) and height are important issues in flood levee system design and modification. This paper derives an economic-engineering theory of the optimal trade-off of levee setback for height both for original and redesigned flood levees, demonstrating the interconnection of levee setback, height, costs and risks, and economically optimal design. These analyses assume stationary flood hydrology and static ratios among damageable property value, unit construction cost, and land price. The economic trade-off of levee setback for height depends on economic cost and benefit and hydraulic parameters, and only indirectly on flood frequency and economic damage parameters. The redesign rules derived in this paper indicate conditions where existing levees should be raised or moved in response to changes in conditions. Numerical examples illustrate the results. This paper demonstrates several ideas and theory for economic flood levee system planning and policy rather than providing guidelines for direct design practice.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUp or Out?—Economic-Engineering Theory of Flood Levee Height and Setback
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:2(90)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record