Show simple item record

contributor authorPaul A. Work
contributor authorSpencer M. Rogers Jr.
contributor authorRobert Osborne
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:30Z
date available2017-05-08T21:07:30Z
date copyrightMarch 1999
date issued1999
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281999%29125%3A2%2888%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39571
description abstractAfter Hurricane Emily struck the Outer Banks of North Carolina in August 1993, approximately 50 homeowners in the towns of Avon, Buxton, Frisco, and Hatteras, N.C., elected to superelevate their houses to reduce the future risk of flooding. Insurance payments served as at least a partial source of funds in most cases. A survey of 30 homeowners from this group was performed in 1995 to determine the motivations, methods, and benefits of the floodproofing retrofits. Half of the homeowners had been flooded at least twice prior to taking action. Homeowners typically made decisions based on memory of prior flood events or advice from others, rather than predictions of flood elevations. Retrofit costs were typically $10,000–$14,000 (in 1993 dollars), representing roughly 15% of the mean assessed house value for the survey. Results question the adequacy of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the area and reveal costs and motivations for flood retrofits of existing residential structures in a coastal barrier island setting.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFlood Retrofit of Coastal Residential Structures: Outer Banks, North Carolina
typeJournal Paper
journal volume125
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:2(88)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record