Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael L. Schneider
contributor authorE. Earl Whitlatch
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:06:42Z
date available2017-05-08T21:06:42Z
date copyrightJanuary 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281991%29117%3A1%2852%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39084
description abstractWater demand elasticity is estimated for six user categories: residential; commercial; industrial; government; school; and total metered. Eight generalized least‐squares, linear regression models are derived for each user category. Explanatory variables tested are price; per capita income; resident population per user account; housing composition; and summer precipitation. Pooled cross‐sectional and time series annual data from the city of Columbus, Ohio, and incorporated suburbs are used. The recommended regression is a partial adjustment, generalized least‐squares model with cross‐sectional dummy variables. Price is a significant factor for all user categories except industry. The greatest price effect was for school accounts, followed by commercial, government, total metered, and residential. Governmental and school demands are most responsive to fluctuations in real income, followed by residential and total metered accounts. Commercial demand was unresponsive to real income. Both short‐run and long‐run elasticities are available from the partial adjustments model, and the time to reach 90% of the long‐run response varies from three to eight years.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUser‐Specific Water Demand Elasticities
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1991)117:1(52)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record