Show simple item record

contributor authorNigel W. Arnell
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:06:29Z
date available2017-05-08T21:06:29Z
date copyrightJanuary 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281989%29115%3A1%2894%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38947
description abstractThe expected annual damge is the most frequently used index of the impact of flooding at a site. However, estimates of expected annual damages are very uncertain as a result of uncertainties in both the estimation of the flood frequency relationship from limited data and the relationships between magnitude and damage. Computer simulation experiments using synthetic flood peak data and fixed magnitude‐damage functions have shown that the sampling distribution of estimates of expected annual damages is highly skewed to a degree depending on the form of the damage function, and most importantly, that bias in the estimates is most closely related to error in the estimated probability at which damage begins. The use of expected probability leads to a very significant increase in bias in the estimation of expected annual damages.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleExpected Annual Damages and Uncertainties in Flood Frequency Estimation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1989)115:1(94)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record