Show simple item record

contributor authorJinghui Zheng
contributor authorHassan Nanbakhsh
contributor authorMiklas Scholz
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:48Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:48Z
date copyrightMarch 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%282006%29132%3A1%2836%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38496
description abstractCombined wetlands and infiltration ponds are cost-effective ‘end of pipe’ drainage solutions that can be applied for local source control as part of urban development and regeneration. The aims of this case study were to assess constraints associated with the planning, design, and operation of these ponds, the influence of aquatic plants on infiltration rates, and the water treatment potential. Storm runoff was first stored and treated in a constructed wetland before it overflowed into parallel infiltration ponds of which one was planted and the other one was unplanted. Three international best management practice design guidelines failed in practice. The presence of macrophytes in one infiltration pond had no significant influence on the drainage properties. The water quality of both ponds was not acceptable for water reuse directly after the system setup. Filamentous green algae within the unplanted pond were blooming in spring and summer creating an aesthetically unpleasing pond surface area. After
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCase Study: Design and Operation of Sustainable Urban Infiltration Ponds Treating Storm Runoff
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:1(36)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record