Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard L. Church
contributor authorAlan T. Murray
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:29Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:29Z
date copyrightMarch 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281993%29119%3A1%2823%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38293
description abstractClosing schools is a difficult task. Such decisions are often made and discussed in an emotionally charged atmosphere. Since there are usually a number of alternatives, researchers have argued for the use of multiobjective programming models that can aid in the generation and analysis of school‐closing alternatives. Diamond and Wright have developed one of the most recent models for the analysis of school‐system consolidation. Their model expressively addresses the optimization of school closing and resulting school utilization. We demonstrate that the Diamond and Wright model has an unintended bias in its formulation that may selectively choose smaller‐capacity schools to close. This paper presents a revised formulation of the Diamond and Wright model that eliminates this bias and takes less time to solve. Two school‐districting problems are solved that depict the inherent problems associated with the original formulation of Diamond and Wright and demonstrate the merits of the revised model formulation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleModeling School Utilization and Consolidation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1993)119:1(23)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record