Show simple item record

contributor authorArthur C. Nelson
contributor authorJames E. Frank
contributor authorJames C. Nicholas
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:28Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:28Z
date copyrightJune 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281992%29118%3A2%2859%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38281
description abstractPolicymakers seem to prefer that sellers of buildable land pay development impact fees in the form of lower land prices, or that builders pay those fees in the form of lower profits. Developers assert that home buyers will pay fees in higher prices. Who really pays the fees? The economic incidence of impact fees is investigated in Sarasota County, Florida. Regression analysis shows that impact fees are positively associated with residential urban land prices. Positive capitalization of impact fees in the urban land market may be due to: (1) Land buyers bidding up land value because impact fees to be paid in the future ensure extension of essential services, thus making land values rise by the expectations of facility extension; (2) the predictability of fee payment, usually through explicit fee schedules; and (3) all the planning and capital programming required to make impact fees legally defensible that has the ultimate effect of ensuring developers of local governments' ability to accommodate development. On the whole, impact‐fee policy is a positive factor in the planning and development of urban areas.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePositive Influence of Impact‐Fee in Urban Planning and Development
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1992)118:2(59)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record