Show simple item record

contributor authorPetra Offrell
contributor authorLeif Sjögren
contributor authorRolf Magnusson
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:04:39Z
date available2017-05-08T21:04:39Z
date copyrightJuly 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%282005%29131%3A7%28552%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37774
description abstractCrack data can be collected using manual or automatic surveys. Traditionally, manual methods are used, and they are still the most common. Changing into automatic systems will enhance the efficiency of data collection as well as the objectivity. In this study the repeatability of an automatic crack data collection system using video images was evaluated. Ten repetitive measurements were made on a 10-km-long road section. Cracking was measured using six laser cameras attached to the same vehicle. The results from the two methods were compared. Simultaneously, a simplified manual windshield survey was conducted by three different persons, and the repeatability obtained was used for comparison with the repeatability established using the image and laser method, respectively. The correlation between repeated measurements using the two automatic systems was high, while the repeatability for the manual, subjective method was low. Suitable measures for crack characterization are discussed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRepeatability in Crack Data Collection on Flexible Pavements: Comparison between Surveys Using Video Cameras, Laser Cameras, and a Simplified Manual Survey
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:7(552)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record