Show simple item record

contributor authorRagab M. Mousa
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:04:10Z
date available2017-05-08T21:04:10Z
date copyrightSeptember 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%282002%29128%3A5%28439%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37446
description abstractThe stopped delay is a primary factor for measuring the level of service at signalized intersections, and the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual proposed a method for measuring the stopped delay in the field based on direct observation of “stopped-vehicle counts.” This paper evaluates the expected error in delay measured by this method for various ranges of counting intervals and survey offsets. A mathematical formulation was derived to evaluate this error for different combinations of relevant parameters. Results indicate that the expected error may exceed ±100% of the deterministic delay, and significant errors are generally associated with shorter cycles, higher green to cycle ratios, lower degrees of saturation, and longer intervals. Significant errors are also reported when the interval perfectly divides the cycle length. A set of optimum offsets is determined for use with the 20-s interval and different combinations of other parameters. These offsets confine the expected error in the measured stopped delay to be within ±1%, a significant improvement regardless of whether the cycle length is divisible by the interval.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAccuracy of Stopped Delay Measured by Stopped-Vehicle Counts Method
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:5(439)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record