Show simple item record

contributor authorC. Zhan
contributor authorB. Rajani
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:33Z
date available2017-05-08T21:03:33Z
date copyrightNovember 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281997%29123%3A6%28447%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37047
description abstractNonlinear finite-element analyses have been carried out to assess the effects of different trench backfill materials, pipe burial depths, and pipe materials on the amount of traffic load transferred to buried pipe. The analyses show that the use of trench backfills such as controlled low strength material (CLSM) instead of traditional materials such as sand and clay, results in significantly reduced stresses in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe under traffic loading. This finding is in agreement with recent truck load tests carried out in the City of Edmonton, where strains were monitored on buried PVC water mains. The protection of buried pipes under or in CLSM backfill from traffic loading becomes more significant with the decrease in pipe burial depth and stiffness. The reasons behind the difference in load transfer between the traditional backfills and CLSM are the high elastic modulus and strength of CLSM, as well as uniform load transfer along the longitudinal axis of the pipe.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLoad Transfer Analyses of Buried Pipe in Different Backfills
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:6(447)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record