Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn D. Reid
contributor authorDean L. Sicking
contributor authorGene W. Paulsen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:03:24Z
date copyrightSeptember 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281996%29122%3A5%28399%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36964
description abstractTurned-down guardrail terminal sections were analyzed using LS-DYNA3D, a dynamic, nonlinear, large deformation finite-element modeling package with capabilities for simulating vehicular impacts into roadside hazards. A baseline simulation was conducted on the existing turned-down approach terminal section, as well as on various retrofit options. Simulation findings were used to identify potential design changes and to select the two most promising options. Modified designs were subjected to six low-speed and one high-speed full-scale crash tests with a minisize automobile. The crash testing verified that one of the retrofit designs would allow the W-beam rail to drop down without causing vehicle rollover when impacted end on by a minisize automobile. However, the revised design did not meet recommended safety standards when one of the weakened posts failed to break away as designed. It is believed that by revising the post installation procedures, the modified turned-down terminal section would perform satisfactorily.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesign and Analysis of Approach Terminal Sections Using Simulation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1996)122:5(399)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record