Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Olszewski
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:00Z
date available2017-05-08T21:03:00Z
date copyrightNovember 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281993%29119%3A6%28835%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36740
description abstractBoth stopped and overall delay are useful measures of intersection performance. While stopped delay is easier to measure, overall delay reflects better the efficiency of traffic signal operation. Ratio of overall to stopped delay was assumed to be constant and equal to 1.3 in the 1985 “Highway Capacity Manual.” Recent improvements of the HCM formula were also based on the same assumption. It is demonstrated that for the uniform delay component, the delay ratio is in fact a function of red‐period duration and deceleration‐acceleration delay. The value of the latter parameter was measured and found to have a mean of 8.6 s. Given this value, the delay ratio is close to 1.3 only for red periods longer than 60 s for random arrivals. For the overflow delay component, the delay ratio depends also on cycle time and degree of saturation. In case of platooned arrivals, the relationship between overall and stopped delay is more complex. This case is analyzed using the step arrival flow model. New equations are proposed for stopped delay as well as for the full and partial stop rates.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleOverall Delay, Stopped Delay, and Stops at Signalized Intersections
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:6(835)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record