Show simple item record

contributor authorAhmad Sadegh
contributor authorA. Essam Radwan
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:23Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:23Z
date copyrightMarch 1988
date issued1988
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281988%29114%3A2%28194%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36368
description abstractDelay is an important measure of effectiveness in traffic studies; it represents the direct cost of fuel consumption and indirect cost of time loss to motorists. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) used delay as the principal measure of level‐of‐service at signalized intersections. The manual introduced a delay model that is based partially on the traditional Webster model. The goals of this study were: (1) To review the delay models currently being used in the SOAP84 computer model for an isolated intersection and by the TRANSYT‐7F computer model for an arterial; (2) Compare them with the original model developed by Webster and the new model proposed by the HCM; and (3) assess the HCM model in both isolated intersection and urban arterial environments. The results show that the new HCM delay model is sensitive to arrival type; thus it is important to know which arrival type to use. The delay values calculated by the new HCM model, SOAP84, and TRANSYT are close to the values resulting from NETSIM.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparative Assessment of 1985 HCM Delay Model
typeJournal Paper
journal volume114
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:2(194)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record