Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Yanalak
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:01:42Z
date available2017-05-08T21:01:42Z
date copyrightFebruary 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%290733-9453%282005%29131%3A1%2815%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35921
description abstractThe estimation of borrow pit volumes is common in many surveying and highway applications. The trapezoidal method (rectangular or triangular prisms), classical cross sectioning (trapezoidal, Simpson, and average formula), and improved methods (Simpson-based, cubic spline, and cubic Hermite formula) have been presented in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to compare volumes determined by the existing methods with volumes calculated by rectangular prisms using the gridding method of natural neighbor on example 2 in a paper by Chen and Lin, which was also used in a work by Easa. The multiquadric and minimum curvature gridding methods tested in Yanalak and Baykal are also applied to this example. For these volumes, excavation height values in a
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComputing Pit Excavation Volume
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2005)131:1(15)
treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record