Show simple item record

contributor authorAndrew C. Kellie
contributor authorA. Essant Radwan
contributor authorDewey R. Houck, II
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:00:56Z
date available2017-05-08T21:00:56Z
date copyrightMarch 1983
date issued1983
identifier other%28asce%290733-9453%281983%29109%3A1%2814%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35457
description abstractWhen boundary evidence of record is vague or uncertain, the intent of the parties to a grant may be inferred from physical evidence which witnesses this intent. In the retracement of boundaries abutting a railroad physical evidence is of two types: (1) Evidence of the location of the roadbed proper; and (2) evidence of the limits of the right‐of‐way as witnessed by fences, ditches, and other objects which would tend to indicate the extent of ownership. Direct evidence of roadbed location can be obtained by mathematically locating the center of the existing tracks and taking into account the necessary geometry of railroad curves and spirals as presented herein. While this allows the surveyor to mathematically define the location of the track, there is no assurance that the roadbed is located at the center of the right‐of‐way. Evidence of the boundary in the form of fences, ditches, or similar markings can serve to collaborate or contradict right‐of‐way location as inferred from the roadbed. In reconciling such situations the surveyor must resort to the appropriate case law and statutes which deal with the subject of the practical location of uncertain boundaries.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLocation of Railroad Boundaries
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1983)109:1(14)
treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record