| contributor author | Adam S. Lubell | |
| contributor author | Evan C. Bentz | |
| contributor author | Michael P. Collins | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:00:45Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:00:45Z | |
| date copyright | January 2009 | |
| date issued | 2009 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%282009%29135%3A1%2878%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35343 | |
| description abstract | Sectional shear models for slender reinforced concrete members developed by several research groups differ in the treatment of longitudinal reinforcement details when evaluating one-way shear capacity. Some models relate the shear capacity directly to the geometric reinforcement ratio while others consider the influence of reinforcement strain or stress. Further, only some models also consider the influence of member depth. The results from six new experimental tests on slender shear-critical members of varying depth, reinforcement ratio, and reinforcement strain at the time of failure are presented and compared with published data. The one-way shear stress at failure was accurately predicted using a recent modified compression field theory based capacity model that incorporates a “size effect” factor related to the member depth, and a “strain effect” factor related to the longitudinal reinforcement demands. Design implications for shear associated with the flexural reinforcement design strength are identified. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Influence of Longitudinal Reinforcement on One-Way Shear in Slabs and Wide Beams | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 135 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:1(78) | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |