Show simple item record

contributor authorTianyi Yi
contributor authorFranklin L. Moon
contributor authorRoberto T. Leon
contributor authorLawrence F. Kahn
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:59:48Z
date available2017-05-08T20:59:48Z
date copyrightMay 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282006%29132%3A5%28653%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34783
description abstractA variety of elastic and inelastic analytical approaches were used to investigate the response of a full-scale unreinforced masonry (URM) structure tested in the laboratory. Elastic analyses, employing a three-dimensional finite element model, revealed little coupling between parallel walls, and pointed to the appropriateness of two-dimensional analytical tools for further simulation of the test structure. The nonlinear analytical methods employed included, in order of increasing complexity, a rigid body analysis, a two-dimensional nonlinear pushover analysis, and a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis. All methods considered important structural characteristics such as failure modes of perforated walls, flange effects, and global overturning moment effect. All methods predicted the experimental behavior fairly well. Strengths and weaknesses of these analytical approaches are discussed, and recommendations for analyzing old URM buildings are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAnalyses of a Two-Story Unreinforced Masonry Building
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(653)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record