Show simple item record

contributor authorUwe Starossek
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:57:12Z
date available2017-05-08T20:57:12Z
date copyrightAugust 1998
date issued1998
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281998%29124%3A8%28975%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/33033
description abstractFlutter analysis in aircraft or bridge engineering has to include motion-induced aerodynamic forces. These forces are mathematically described in two equivalent ways, namely, by real number or complex number expressions. Accordingly, flutter analysis can be performed using either real or complex arithmetic. At first glance, the use of either kind of notation seems to be more a question of personal preference, as both lead to the same numerical results. Nevertheless, this paper attempts to advocate the use of complex notation both in aircraft and bridge flutter analysis. Real-number and complex-number descriptions of the same mechanical phenomena are compared. It is shown that, apart from computational advantages, complex notation leads to mathematically more compact and more elegant expressions, which is of significance particularly from an educational standpoint.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComplex Notation in Flutter Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(975)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 124 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record