Show simple item record

contributor authorPaolo Bazzurro
contributor authorC. Allin Cornell
contributor authorNilesh Shome
contributor authorJorge E. Carballo
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:56:58Z
date available2017-05-08T20:56:58Z
date copyrightNovember 1998
date issued1998
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281998%29124%3A11%281281%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/32883
description abstractThis paper reviews, compares, and contrasts the three methodologies proposed by C. A. Cornell, by Y. K. Wen, and by FEMA 273 (as proposed by H. Krawinkler) for predicting the postelastic response of buildings subject to seismic excitation. All three methods have the potential to contribute effectively to the problem of improving the practical prediction of seismic response of structures. Applications include preliminary design, routine (code) use, calibration of codes, and specific structure assessment. These methods appear different because their authors did not share the same objectives or information bases. The methods by Cornell and Wen are decisively prediction-oriented in explicitly probabilistic frameworks. The approach suggested by Krawinkler has instead the goal of understanding in some average sense the seismic response of structures at various performance levels. This last method has been adopted, however, for prediction purposes by the FEMA 273 Guidelines for rehabilitation of existing buildings. Despite the differences, the work proposed by these researchers is profitably brought under the same perspective here.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleThree Proposals for Characterizing MDOF Nonlinear Seismic Response
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1281)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 124 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record