Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert M. Clark
contributor authorRichard G. Eilers
contributor authorJames A. Goodrich
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:55:53Z
date available2017-05-08T20:55:53Z
date copyrightDecember 1984
date issued1984
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%281984%29110%3A6%281146%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/32209
description abstractThere is growing concern over the quality of the nations groundwater resources. Instances of ground water contamination from organic chemicals have been reported in virtually all states. Long‐term policy should be directed toward the protection of ground‐water quality. Although, ideally, ground water contamination should be prevented, existing contamination problems must be addressed. This paper discusses several control technology options available to treat ground water for organic chemical contamination. A cost and performance analysis is presented in order to guide the selection of control technologies for seven major contaminants: trichloroethylene; tetrachloroethylene; 1,1,1‐ trichloroethane; carbon tetrachloride; cis‐1‐2‐dichloroethylene; 1‐2 dichloroethane; 1‐1 dichloroethylene. In all cases aeration is the cheapest alternative for treatment. If adsorption is required, home units using granular activated carbon (GAC) may prove to be cheaper than central adsorption treatment.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleVOCs in Drinking Water: Cost of Removal
typeJournal Paper
journal volume110
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:6(1146)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record