Show simple item record

contributor authorW. M. Kim Roddis
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:55:06Z
date available2017-05-08T20:55:06Z
date copyrightMay 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281993%29119%3A5%281539%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/31703
description abstractMajor engineering failures act as a catalyst for change in standards of practice and therefore create the opportunity for establishing better ethical practices for the profession. When examining ethics in engineering practice, it is useful to make the distinction between ethics in engineering and ethics of engineering. Ethics in engineering deals with the ethics of actions of individual engineers. Ethics of engineering deals with ethical issues that involve the role of engineers in industry, the ethics of the organizations in which they work and of professional engineering societies, and the ethical responsibilities of the profession. This paper presents case studies of two major structural disasters—the 1907 Quebec Bridge collapse and the 1981 Kansas City, Mo. Hyatt Regency walkway failure. The effect of each failure on engineering ethics is examined from the viewpoint of both ethics in engineering and of ethics of engineering. In response to failures, engineers need to change professional procedures and practices so that they reinforce, rather than place obstacles in the way of, moral action.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStructural Failures and Engineering Ethics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1539)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record