Show simple item record

contributor authorStephen G. Buonopane
contributor authorDavid P. Billington
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:55:03Z
date available2017-05-08T20:55:03Z
date copyrightMarch 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281993%29119%3A3%28954%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/31664
description abstractWithin the context of a historical overview, this paper examines how the history and theory of suspension bridges affected their design between 1823 and 1940. Navier's theory of the unstiffened suspension bridge reveals the concept of cable stiffness. The experience of wind‐induced motion in 19th century bridges was a primary influence in the adoption of the stiffening truss, and the Rankine theory, which first considered such trasses, resembles a simple beam solution. The subsequent elastic theory as shown in this paper also resembles a simple beam solution. A reformulation of the deflection theory presented here allows for a physical interpretation and comparison to the previous theories. In examining these theories, this paper gives results of sample calculations based on the Monongahela, Delaware River, and George Washington Bridges; these specific examples reveal certain properties of the theories that emphasize the importance of physical understanding to the use of mathematical theories.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTheory and History of Suspension Bridge Design from 1823 to 1940
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:3(954)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record