Show simple item record

contributor authorT. Y. Torng
contributor authorP. H. Wirsching
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:54:02Z
date available2017-05-08T20:54:02Z
date copyrightDecember 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281991%29117%3A12%283804%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/31037
description abstractStructures dominated by dynamic tensile loads are vulnerable to failure by fatigue and/or fracture. Failure in one member of a redundant structure produces transient dynamic loads in the remaining intact members, with the possibility of progressive collapse. Design factors are subject to large variability, and reliability methods are relevant for analysis. Reliability, however, can also be improved by a maintenance program of periodic inspection and repair. The fatigue/fracture reliability and maintainability (FRM) process is defined. Analysis of the process focuses on estimating the statistical distribution of the time to system failure. Simulation methods are employed to construct this distribution. Examples of solutions of the FRM process are presented. The illustrations demonstrate: (1) Improvement in reliability with additional redundancy; (2) degradation in reliability by adding series elements; (3) impact of an inspection program on reliability; and (4) the “aging” process in a structure.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFatigue and Fracture Reliability and Maintainability Process
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3804)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record