Show simple item record

contributor authorD. H. Turkington
contributor authorA. J. Carr
contributor authorN. Cooke
contributor authorP. J. Moss
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:53:11Z
date available2017-05-08T20:53:11Z
date copyrightDecember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281989%29115%3A12%283000%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/30490
description abstractThis paper reports on a parametric study of the response of bridge superstructures supported on lead‐rubber bearings when subjected to the 1940 El Centro earthquake (N‐S component) and the 1966 Parkfield earthquake. The effect of parameters such as lead‐plug size and aspect ratio, bearing thickness and yield strength, pier, abutment, and superstructure stiffnesses, and different earthquake records were investigated. The results of the time‐history analyses by Turkington (1987) produced clear trends that are used in the design procedure proposed by Turkington et al. (1987, 1989). The trends showed that the presence of lead shifts the natural period of the structure and increases the amount of damping. The magnitude of the period change and damping decreases as the natural period of the structure increases or as the pier height increases. Lead‐rubber bearings are most effective when used in conjunction with stiff substructures and can be used to redistribute seismic forces between piers and abutments.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSeismic Design of Bridges on Lead‐Rubber Bearings
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:12(3000)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record