Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. M. Hathaway
contributor authorW. F. Hunt
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:50:07Z
date available2017-05-08T20:50:07Z
date copyrightAugust 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%282008%29134%3A4%28538%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28684
description abstractLevel spreaders are commonly used in combination with riparian buffers as a stormwater best management practice in many parts of the United States. These systems have not been extensively studied in urbanized environments to determine if they can provide a long-term water quality benefit. In winter 2005, 24 level spreaders were evaluated in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Detailed observations were made at 20 of these locations. The results of the study indicate that level spreaders may not be the versatile structure they are perceived to be. No level spreader-riparian buffer system was able to provide diffuse flow through the riparian buffer from the level spreader to the stream. Common causes for failure to maintain diffuse flow included: lack of maintenance (12 cases), poor design (11), riparian topography/content (11), level spreader lip not level (seven), built with easily eroded materials (six), poor construction methods (three), and human interference (two). This field evaluation indicates that level spreader systems may need design revisions, construction guidance, and maintenance requirements before they continue to be used
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleField Evaluation of Level Spreaders in the Piedmont of North Carolina
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(538)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record