Show simple item record

contributor authorW. F. Hunt
contributor authorA. R. Jarrett
contributor authorJ. T. Smith
contributor authorL. J. Sharkey
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:49:49Z
date available2017-05-08T20:49:49Z
date copyrightDecember 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%282006%29132%3A6%28600%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28493
description abstractThree bioretention field sites in North Carolina were examined for pollutant removal abilities and hydrologic performance. The cells varied by fill media type or drainage configuration. The field studies confirmed high annual total nitrogen mass removal rates at two conventionally drained bioretention cells (40% reduction each). Nitrate-nitrogen mass removal rates varied between 75 and 13%, and calculated annual mass removal of zinc, copper, and lead from one Greensboro cell were 98, 99, and 81%, respectively. All high mass removal rates were due to a substantial decrease in outflow volume. The ratio of volume of water leaving the bioretention cell versus that which entered the cell varied from 0.07 (summer) to 0.54 (winter). There was a significant
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEvaluating Bioretention Hydrology and Nutrient Removal at Three Field Sites in North Carolina
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record