Show simple item record

contributor authorT. S. Strelkoff
contributor authorH. T. Falvey
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:49Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:49Z
date copyrightJuly 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281993%29119%3A4%28637%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27462
description abstractThis paper presents a critical review of numerical methods used to model unsteady flow in canals. The significance of the various forms of the governing equations is outlined, and the problems associated with the evaluation of boundary drag and head loss are introduced. The attributes of the numerical solution techniques are described. These attributes include applicability, accuracy, convenience, and robustness. Both legitimate and nonlegitimate methods of achieving robustness are considered. Approximate hydrologic techniques are viewed from the perspective gained by a review of the complete equations. Characteristic and finite‐difference techniques for solving the full equations are compared. Practical difficulties in detecting bore‐wave formation during a simulation are noted. Specific techniques are recommended for difficult problems such as the computation of very shallow flows. Practical considerations concerning testing of the techniques and a cautionary note for users of computer‐simulation models are given.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNumerical Methods Used to Model Unsteady Canal Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:4(637)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record