Show simple item record

contributor authorC. M. Burt
contributor authorG. Gartrell
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:49Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:49Z
date copyrightJuly 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281993%29119%3A4%28631%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27461
description abstractUnsteady canal‐simulation model usage requires serious investments of time and personnel. The reasons for deciding to invest in a model, as well as reasons not to invest, are discussed. For most cases, it is better to invest in the improvement of an existing model than the writing of a new model. Many excellent models are available, although very few can be considered user‐friendly for the average design engineer. Unsteady flow‐simulation models are not recommended for real‐time control, but are key tools for the study of various control scenarios. Canal models can simulate an actual canal, but the user must input the necessary canal gate‐control algorithms in order to study the effects of various types of automation and control. The user must also understand the basics of the system to be modeled and have the time and capability to determine if model results are reasonable and sound.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIrrigation‐Canal‐Simulation Model Usage
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:4(631)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record