Show simple item record

contributor authorK. D. Konyha
contributor authorR. W. Skaggs
contributor authorJ. W. Gilliam
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:39Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:39Z
date copyrightSeptember 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281992%29118%3A5%28807%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27372
description abstractThe hydrology of two North Carolina muck soils was simulated using four water‐management methods; conventional drainage, improved subsurface drainage, and two types of controlled drainage. One soil was much more responsive to water management than the other. For the more responsive soil, improved subsurface drainage reduced surface runoff by 192 mm/year (66%) but raised outflow by 40 mm/year (10%). Large daily flows
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEffects of Drainage and Water‐Management Practices on Hydrology
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:5(807)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record