Show simple item record

contributor authorG. V. Loganathan
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:28Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:28Z
date copyrightSeptember 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281991%29117%3A5%28716%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27266
description abstractThis paper presents optimality conditions tor a parabolic‐eanal design accounting for freeboard and limitations on velocity and canal dimensions. Freeboard may be based on a design discharge or specified as a function of flow depth, which is more general. The analysis reveals that the side‐slope parameter for the best hydraulic section is 0.514, not 0.7 as reported in the literature for parabolic canals. The aforementioned hydraulic considerations tend to shape the optimal canal narrow and deep. A formulation for the minimization of the sum of excavation and lining costs favors slightly wider canals when the ratio of cost of lining to cost of excavation is high. The necessary conditions for minima are stated analytically. It is shown that the optimal side‐slope parameter of 0.514 sets an upper bound with the implication that no optimal parabola can be wider than the classical best section for a given discharge. Design aids in the form of tables are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleOptimal Design of Parabolic Canals
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1991)117:5(716)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record