Show simple item record

contributor authorAvinash S. Patwardhan
contributor authorJohn L. Nieber
contributor authorEldon L. Johns
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:12Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:12Z
date copyrightMarch 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281990%29116%3A2%28182%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27137
description abstractNumerous methods for estimating effective rainfall have been proposed in the past, including: direct measurement techniques; empirical methods; and soil water balance methods. The best estimates of effective rainfall can be obtained by conducting soil water balance computations. A soil water balance model (SWBM) for estimating effective rainfall was used to test the accuracy of the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA‐SCS) and the Hershfield effective rainfall estimation methods for a well‐drained soil and for a poorly drained soil. Estimates of mean annual monthly effective rainfall by the USDA‐SCS and estimates of mean annual growing season effective rainfall by the Hershfield method were found to compare closely with estimates from the SWBM for the well‐drained soil but not for the poorly drained soil. Effective rainfall estimates by these two methods for either soil condition did not compare well with the SWBM estimates for annual events with return periods higher than the mean annual event.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEffective Rainfall Estimation Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:2(182)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record