Show simple item record

contributor authorSun F. Shih
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:46:51Z
date available2017-05-08T20:46:51Z
date copyrightFebruary 1988
date issued1988
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281988%29114%3A1%28143%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26938
description abstractThe difference in sugarcane evapotranspiration (ET), sugarcane yield, and soil moisture content between drip irrigation and subirrigation, are compared using four lysimeters, each 5.5‐m diameter by 1.2‐m deep. Plant cane with two ratoons are grown. The results show that the soil moisture content in the profile with the subirrigation system is much greater than with the drip irrigation system. Before canopy closure of the plant cane, ET from drip irrigation is significantly lower than from subirrigation; whereas, after canopy closure for the two ratoons, the ET from drip irrigation is significantly higher than from subirrigation. Cane yield from drip irrigation is significantly higher than from subirrigation. About 95 kg and 109 kg of water are required to produce 1 kg of cane yield for drip irrigation and subirrigation, respectively.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDrip Irrigation and Subirrigation of Sugarcane
typeJournal Paper
journal volume114
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1988)114:1(143)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record