Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard G. Allen
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:46:45Z
date available2017-05-08T20:46:45Z
date copyrightNovember 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281986%29112%3A4%28348%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26866
description abstractTen forms of the Penman combination evapotranspiration equation are reviewed and compared with lysimeter estimates at three locations. Aerodynamic and canopy resistance forms by Monteith and Thom and Oliver and an empirical form by Wright best predict daily lysimeter measurements at Kimberly, Idaho, and Coshocton, Ohio. Canopy resistances of 40–80 s/m and momentum roughness heights of 15 mm for clipped grass and 45–70 mm for tall grass and alfalfa result in best estimates by the Monteith and Thom‐Oliver methods. The original Penman and Priestley‐Taylor versions underestimated evapotranspiration in the arid Kimberly environment. Average standard errors of estimate of the best equations average about 0.8 mm/day over growing seasons.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleA Penman for All Seasons
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:4(348)
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record