Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. C. Dietrich
contributor authorR. L. Kolar
contributor authorK. M. Dresback
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:46:06Z
date available2017-05-08T20:46:06Z
date copyrightMay 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%282008%29134%3A5%28520%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26488
description abstractMass balance error has been computed traditionally by using conventional fluxes derived from the conservation of mass equation, but recent literature supports a method based on fluxes that are consistent with the discretization of the governing equations. By comparing the mass residuals from these two methods to the truncation errors produced by the discretization of the governing equations, we show that the conventional fluxes produce mass residuals that are more descriptive of the overall behavior of the model, i.e., they are better correlated with truncation error. Then we demonstrate that these mass residuals can be used as a criterion for mesh refinement. In an example using a one-dimensional shallow water model, we demonstrate that, by moving nodes from regions with large mass residuals to regions with small mass residuals, a mesh can be developed that shows less truncation error than a mesh developed by using localized truncation error analysis. And, in an example using a two-dimensional shallow water model, we demonstrate that the computed solution can be improved in regions with large mass residuals through mesh refinement.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMass Residuals as a Criterion for Mesh Refinement in Continuous Galerkin Shallow Water Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(520)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record