Show simple item record

contributor authorGregory Carter
contributor authorSimon D. Smith
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:44:09Z
date available2017-05-08T20:44:09Z
date copyrightFebruary 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282006%29132%3A2%28197%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/25287
description abstractHazard identification is fundamental to construction safety management; unidentified hazards present the most unmanageable risks. This paper presents an investigation indicating the current levels of hazard identification on three U.K. construction projects. A maximum of only 6.7% of the method statements analyzed on these projects managed to identify all of the hazards that should have been identified, based upon current knowledge. Maximum hazard identification levels were found to be 0.899 (89.9%) for a construction project within the nuclear industry, 0.728 (72.8%) for a project within the railway industry, and 0.665 (66.5%) for a project within both the railway and general construction industry sector. The results indicate that hazard identification levels are far from ideal. A discussion on the reasons for low hazard identification levels indicates key barriers. This leads to the presentation of an Information Technology (IT) tool for construction project safety management (Total-Safety) and, in particular, a module within Total-Safety designed to help construction personnel develop method statements with improved levels of hazard identification.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSafety Hazard Identification on Construction Projects
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(197)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record