Show simple item record

contributor authorZiji Zhang
contributor authorJunmei Cai
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:43:20Z
date available2017-05-08T20:43:20Z
date copyrightNovember 1999
date issued1999
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281999%29125%3A11%281150%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/24742
description abstractA compromise orifice geometry is experimentally proven to cause a smaller local pressure drop in conduit flow. An orifice installed as an energy dissipator in a flood conduit is required to dissipate a designed amount of energy at the design discharge. A small local pressure drop is preferred to minimize the cavitation risk. Experiments show that the orifice geometry strongly affects the wall-pressure distributions. Although sharp-edged and streamlined orifice plates can meet the energy dissipation requirement, they both cause larger pressure drops than do orifices shaped with compromise geometry that is neither sharp-edged nor streamlined. A compromise between the contraction ratio and the abruptness of transition helps minimize pressure drop. If the required energy loss increases, the compromise geometry should be more streamlined and have a smaller contraction ratio. The present paper provides the possibility of using alternative orifice geometry, such as a sloping-approach orifice, to reduce the risk of cavitation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCompromise Orifice Geometry to Minimize Pressure Drop
typeJournal Paper
journal volume125
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:11(1150)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record