Show simple item record

contributor authorObaid Saad Al-Sobiei
contributor authorDavid Arditi
contributor authorGul Polat
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:43:06Z
date available2017-05-08T20:43:06Z
date copyrightSeptember 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282005%29131%3A9%28973%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/24597
description abstractThe objective of the study presented in this paper is to provide owners with a decision-making mechanism that will free them from automatically taking the typical “transfer the risk to a surety” option and will allow them to make intelligent and economical decisions that include retaining or avoiding the risk of contractor default. The methodology involves using artificial neural network (ANN) and a genetic algorithm (GA) training strategies to predict the risk of contractor default. Prediction rates of 75 and 88% were obtained with the ANN and GA training strategies, respectively. The model is of relevance to owners because once the likelihood of contractor default is predicted and the owner’s risk behavior is established, the owner can make a decision to retain, transfer, or avoid the risk of contractor default. It is of relevance to surety companies too as it may speed up the process of bonding and of reaching more reliable and objective bond/not bond decisions. The comparative use of the ANN and GA training strategies is of particular relevance to researchers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleManaging Owner’s Risk of Contractor Default
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:9(973)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record