Show simple item record

contributor authorJocelyn M. Gaudet
contributor authorAndré G. Roy
contributor authorJames L. Best
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date available2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date copyrightJune 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281994%29120%3A6%28758%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23994
description abstractTwo series of laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of mean flow direction and sampler size (7,6 cm aperture vs 3 cm aperture) upon the efficiency of Helley‐Smith samplers in subcritical flows. The formation of flow circulation zones both inside and outside the sampler was found to occur at divergence angles between the sampler and mean flow of as little as 10°. The creation of these recirculation regions, and especially a zone of separated flow inside the sampler nozzle, is mirrored by a decrease in the sediment sampling efficiency. Additionally, Investigation of the performance of small Helley‐Smith samplers reveals that these trap less sediment per unit width than standard size samplers (7,6 cm). This lower sampling efficiency is linked to the lower protrusion of the sampler into the boundary layer.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEffect of Orientation and Size of Helley‐Smith Sampler on Its Efficiency
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:6(758)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record