Show simple item record

contributor authorAlexander Laufer
contributor authorBrian E. Moore
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:41:13Z
date available2017-05-08T20:41:13Z
date copyrightMarch 1983
date issued1983
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281983%29109%3A1%2889%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23508
description abstractImpressive results have been achieved by implementing financial incentive programs in construction in several foreign countries and in numerous other industries in the United States. This paper identifies the historical causes for the scarcity of such programs in the U.S. construction industry, highlights current obstacles to their introduction, and recommends steps to avoid or overcome them, so as to open the way to future introduction of incentive programs. The study employs the Delphi technique and concludes that the near absence of pay programs in the construction industry in the U.S. can be attributed to: (1) Tradition and conservatism of the industry; (2) union opposition; and (3) the nature of the work. The panel predicted significant differences between the overall attitudes of the various parties toward productivity pay programs; the contractors and the owners will be supportive, the employees somewhat supportive, the government neutral, and the union opposed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAttitudes toward Productivity Pay Programs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1983)109:1(89)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record